Why Markets
Using public market data to test anomaly detection, with transaction costs and benchmark returns as part of the evaluation.
- Published
- Updated
Thread · 3 posts
Applying anomaly-detection ideas to market data. The posts move from defining the evaluation to repairing price-based backtests, then to alternative-data pipelines and early prediction-market experiments, with costs and benchmarks included throughout.
Posts follow their reading order. Each shows its publication date and latest revision.
Reading path
The double ring marks the latest post.
Using public market data to test anomaly detection, with transaction costs and benchmark returns as part of the evaluation.
Implement and audit the backtest
Public data and evaluation criteria become an implemented backtest. Rebalancing, universe selection, and signal timing are checked before interpreting strategy returns.
Testing about 20 strategy variants across 20 years of ETF and equity data, correcting the backtest, and comparing the surviving momentum and trend strategies across three periods.
Try new data and contracts
The price-based tests found no significant alpha. The search extends to filings, positioning, macro data, and Kalshi contracts, with publication timing, leakage, and fees part of the evaluation.
SEC filing sentiment, CFTC positioning, and early experiments with Kalshi data, with attention to publication times, evaluation leakage, and trading costs.